Showing posts with label tech tips. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tech tips. Show all posts
Sunday, October 13, 2013
Thursday, August 22, 2013
Addition by Subtraction
Addition by Subtraction. Genny read me the riot act when we returned from Canada: Clean off all the piles of papers on the dining room table. So I put them on our bed, a very temporary solution to be sure.
Then I set out to call Microsoft to reinstall my Office Home & Business 2013, which I had mistakenly erased while up in Canada. Without thinking. I had forgotten that all calls to the call center would lead to the ultimate question, What is the registration key to the original program? After wrangling with Ashad and even me breaking down, he put me on hold and sympathetically brought in a third-party supervisor and they gave me a new registration key. Genny had watched my breakdown and had left the room and house.
Two hours later, having time to reflect after Microsoft had "taken control" of my computer and the program was reloaded by the Microsoft representative, my eyes fell on the remaining "Thriftway" bag on the table. Contained within it was all the papers from Micro Center from the day I first bought my two computers, including a box for each Microsoft Home & Office 2013 program for each computer. I knew at the time how important it was to segregate these documents. I knew then that "filing" or "shelving" might not do the trick. So I must have figured that keeping those items in a separate bag would be the best way to make them special for the inevitable occasion when I would have to reload the program.
But then I forgot about this "trick." The bag became meaningless.
Then I set out to call Microsoft to reinstall my Office Home & Business 2013, which I had mistakenly erased while up in Canada. Without thinking. I had forgotten that all calls to the call center would lead to the ultimate question, What is the registration key to the original program? After wrangling with Ashad and even me breaking down, he put me on hold and sympathetically brought in a third-party supervisor and they gave me a new registration key. Genny had watched my breakdown and had left the room and house.
Two hours later, having time to reflect after Microsoft had "taken control" of my computer and the program was reloaded by the Microsoft representative, my eyes fell on the remaining "Thriftway" bag on the table. Contained within it was all the papers from Micro Center from the day I first bought my two computers, including a box for each Microsoft Home & Office 2013 program for each computer. I knew at the time how important it was to segregate these documents. I knew then that "filing" or "shelving" might not do the trick. So I must have figured that keeping those items in a separate bag would be the best way to make them special for the inevitable occasion when I would have to reload the program.
But then I forgot about this "trick." The bag became meaningless.
Monday, May 20, 2013
Tech Tips -- Don't Put Any Day-to-Day Files on Your C Drive
To keep your pc running cleaner and longer! Md.
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Tech Tips -- The Spike From Hell
Because my f3 key is set primarily for brightness, on my new laptop, I must do control+FN+f3, not control+f3. Then, at the end control+shift+FN+f3.
It took a lot of thought and time and luck to find the answer. It helped that I bought two computers on the same date and loaded them with identical programs.
More later
Finding all my original packaging for Microsoft Office 2013, which included information that led me to the telephone number of a real person in India who eventually, after I taught her what a spike was and convinced her that no, Microsoft wouldn't have taken it out in their latest version of Word, took control of my machine and she could do it the old-fashioned way: control+f3.
Sunday, September 9, 2012
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Monday, August 15, 2011
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Tech Tip -- Don't Pay For Antivirus Program Again
¶ You don’t have to pay for antivirus and anti-spyware software, year after year. Microsoft offers a perfectly good free security program. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security_essentials/default.aspx
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Tech Tips -- Not All Homeowners Insurance is the Same
http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/21/not-all-homeowners-policies-are-alike/?hp
Here’s one example: The standard contract insures a home against risk of “direct physical loss to property,” he noted. But some insurers have altered that language to say “sudden and accidental” direct physical loss to property. (His paper doesn’t identify which specific insurers use the language, he said, because he wants to focus on changes regulators should make.) Such wording, he said, might be used to deny claims for vandalism or from a threat that grew over time — say, an old tree that weakens and eventually falls on a house. It’s conceivable, he said, that the language could be used to deny claims for theft on the grounds that the loss wasn’t “accidental.”
May 11, 2011: I checked my homeowners policy with Cincinnati Insurance Company and they are in the "good guys" camp. At least I am 90% sure, without reading the 40+ other pages plus the second document which is the June 2001 addendum carefully.
Here’s one example: The standard contract insures a home against risk of “direct physical loss to property,” he noted. But some insurers have altered that language to say “sudden and accidental” direct physical loss to property. (His paper doesn’t identify which specific insurers use the language, he said, because he wants to focus on changes regulators should make.) Such wording, he said, might be used to deny claims for vandalism or from a threat that grew over time — say, an old tree that weakens and eventually falls on a house. It’s conceivable, he said, that the language could be used to deny claims for theft on the grounds that the loss wasn’t “accidental.”
May 11, 2011: I checked my homeowners policy with Cincinnati Insurance Company and they are in the "good guys" camp. At least I am 90% sure, without reading the 40+ other pages plus the second document which is the June 2001 addendum carefully.
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Friday, February 18, 2011
Tech Tips -- Beware of Hot Spots
New Hacking Tools Pose Bigger Threats to Wi-Fi Users
Published: February 16, 2011
You may think the only people capable of snooping on your Internet activity are government intelligence agents or possibly a talented teenage hacker holed up in his parents’ basement. But some simple software lets just about anyone sitting next to you at your local coffee shop watch you browse the Web and even assume your identity online.
“Like it or not, we are now living in a cyberpunk novel,” said Darren Kitchen, a systems administrator for an aerospace company in Richmond, Calif., and the host of Hak5, a video podcast about computer hacking and security. “When people find out how trivial and easy it is to see and even modify what you do online, they are shocked.”
Until recently, only determined and knowledgeable hackers with fancy tools and lots of time on their hands could spy while you used your laptop or smartphone at Wi-Fi hot spots. But a free program called Firesheep, released in October, has made it simple to see what other users of an unsecured Wi-Fi network are doing and then log on as them at the sites they visited.
Without issuing any warnings of the possible threat, Web site administrators have since been scrambling to provide added protections.
“I released Firesheep to show that a core and widespread issue in Web site security is being ignored,” said Eric Butler, a freelance software developer in Seattle who created the program. “It points out the lack of end-to-end encryption.”
What he means is that while the password you initially enter on Web sites like Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, Amazon, eBay and The New York Times is encrypted, the Web browser’s cookie, a bit of code that that identifies your computer, your settings on the site or other private information, is often not encrypted. Firesheep grabs that cookie, allowing nosy or malicious users to, in essence, be you on the site and have full access to your account.
More than a million people have downloaded the program in the last three months (including this reporter, who is not exactly a computer genius). And it is easy to use.
The only sites that are safe from snoopers are those that employ the cryptographic protocol transport layer security or its predecessor, secure sockets layer, throughout your session. PayPal and many banks do this, but a startling number of sites that people trust to safeguard their privacy do not. You know you are shielded from prying eyes if a little lock appears in the corner of your browser or the Web address starts with “https” rather than “http.”
“The usual reason Web sites give for not encrypting all communication is that it will slow down the site and would be a huge engineering expense,” said Chris Palmer, technology director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an electronic rights advocacy group based in San Francisco. “Yes, there are operational hurdles, but they are solvable.”
Indeed, Gmail made end-to-end encryption its default mode in January 2010. Facebook began to offer the same protection as an opt-in security feature last month, though it is so far available only to a small percentage of users and has limitations. For example, it doesn’t work with many third-party applications.
“It’s worth noting that Facebook took this step, but it’s too early to congratulate them,” said Mr. Butler, who is frustrated that “https” is not the site’s default setting. “Most people aren’t going to know about it or won’t think it’s important or won’t want to use it when they find out that it disables major applications.”
Joe Sullivan, chief security officer at Facebook, said the company was engaged in a “deliberative rollout process,” to access and address any unforeseen difficulties. “We hope to have it available for all users in the next several weeks,” he said, adding that the company was also working to address problems with third-party applications and to make “https” the default setting.
Many Web sites offer some support for encryption via “https,” but they make it difficult to use. To address these problems, the Electronic Frontier Foundation in collaboration with the Tor Project, another group concerned with Internet privacy, released in June an add-on to the browser Firefox, called Https Everywhere. The extension, which can be downloaded at eff.org/https-everywhere, makes “https” the stubbornly unchangeable default on all sites that support it.
Since not all Web sites have “https” capability, Bill Pennington, chief strategy officer with the Web site risk management firm WhiteHat Security in Santa Clara, Calif., said: “I tell people that if you’re doing things with sensitive data, don’t do it at a Wi-Fi hot spot. Do it at home.”
But home wireless networks may not be all that safe either, because of free and widely available Wi-Fi cracking programs like Gerix WiFi Cracker, Aircrack-ng and Wifite. The programs work by faking legitimate user activity to collect a series of so-called weak keys or clues to the password. The process is wholly automated, said Mr. Kitchen at Hak5, allowing even techno-ignoramuses to recover a wireless router’s password in a matter of seconds. “I’ve yet to find a WEP-protected network not susceptible to this kind of attack,” Mr. Kitchen said.
A WEP-encrypted password (for wired equivalent privacy) is not as strong as a WPA (or Wi-Fi protected access) password, so it’s best to use a WPA password instead. Even so, hackers can use the same free software programs to get on WPA password-protected networks as well. It just takes much longer (think weeks) and more computer expertise.
Using such programs along with high-powered Wi-Fi antennas that cost less than $90, hackers can pull in signals from home networks two to three miles away. There are also some computerized cracking devices with built-in antennas on the market, like WifiRobin ($156). But experts said they were not as fast or effective as the latest free cracking programs, because the devices worked only on WEP-protected networks.
To protect yourself, changing the Service Set Identifier or SSID of your wireless network from the default name of your router (like Linksys or Netgear) to something less predictable helps, as does choosing a lengthy and complicated alphanumeric password.
Setting up a virtual private network, or V.P.N., which encrypts all communications you transmit wirelessly whether on your home network or at a hot spot, is even more secure. The data looks like gibberish to a snooper as it travels from your computer to a secure server before it is blasted onto the Internet.
Popular V.P.N. providers include VyperVPN, HotSpotVPN and LogMeIn Hamachi. Some are free; others are as much as $18 a month, depending on how much data is encrypted. Free versions tend to encrypt only Web activity and not e-mail exchanges.
However, Mr. Palmer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation blames poorly designed Web sites, not vulnerable Wi-Fi connections, for security lapses. “Many popular sites were not designed for security from the beginning, and now we are suffering the consequences,” he said. “People need to demand ‘https’ so Web sites will do the painful integration work that needs to be done.”
Published: February 16, 2011
You may think the only people capable of snooping on your Internet activity are government intelligence agents or possibly a talented teenage hacker holed up in his parents’ basement. But some simple software lets just about anyone sitting next to you at your local coffee shop watch you browse the Web and even assume your identity online.
“Like it or not, we are now living in a cyberpunk novel,” said Darren Kitchen, a systems administrator for an aerospace company in Richmond, Calif., and the host of Hak5, a video podcast about computer hacking and security. “When people find out how trivial and easy it is to see and even modify what you do online, they are shocked.”
Until recently, only determined and knowledgeable hackers with fancy tools and lots of time on their hands could spy while you used your laptop or smartphone at Wi-Fi hot spots. But a free program called Firesheep, released in October, has made it simple to see what other users of an unsecured Wi-Fi network are doing and then log on as them at the sites they visited.
Without issuing any warnings of the possible threat, Web site administrators have since been scrambling to provide added protections.
“I released Firesheep to show that a core and widespread issue in Web site security is being ignored,” said Eric Butler, a freelance software developer in Seattle who created the program. “It points out the lack of end-to-end encryption.”
What he means is that while the password you initially enter on Web sites like Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, Amazon, eBay and The New York Times is encrypted, the Web browser’s cookie, a bit of code that that identifies your computer, your settings on the site or other private information, is often not encrypted. Firesheep grabs that cookie, allowing nosy or malicious users to, in essence, be you on the site and have full access to your account.
More than a million people have downloaded the program in the last three months (including this reporter, who is not exactly a computer genius). And it is easy to use.
The only sites that are safe from snoopers are those that employ the cryptographic protocol transport layer security or its predecessor, secure sockets layer, throughout your session. PayPal and many banks do this, but a startling number of sites that people trust to safeguard their privacy do not. You know you are shielded from prying eyes if a little lock appears in the corner of your browser or the Web address starts with “https” rather than “http.”
“The usual reason Web sites give for not encrypting all communication is that it will slow down the site and would be a huge engineering expense,” said Chris Palmer, technology director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an electronic rights advocacy group based in San Francisco. “Yes, there are operational hurdles, but they are solvable.”
Indeed, Gmail made end-to-end encryption its default mode in January 2010. Facebook began to offer the same protection as an opt-in security feature last month, though it is so far available only to a small percentage of users and has limitations. For example, it doesn’t work with many third-party applications.
“It’s worth noting that Facebook took this step, but it’s too early to congratulate them,” said Mr. Butler, who is frustrated that “https” is not the site’s default setting. “Most people aren’t going to know about it or won’t think it’s important or won’t want to use it when they find out that it disables major applications.”
Joe Sullivan, chief security officer at Facebook, said the company was engaged in a “deliberative rollout process,” to access and address any unforeseen difficulties. “We hope to have it available for all users in the next several weeks,” he said, adding that the company was also working to address problems with third-party applications and to make “https” the default setting.
Many Web sites offer some support for encryption via “https,” but they make it difficult to use. To address these problems, the Electronic Frontier Foundation in collaboration with the Tor Project, another group concerned with Internet privacy, released in June an add-on to the browser Firefox, called Https Everywhere. The extension, which can be downloaded at eff.org/https-everywhere, makes “https” the stubbornly unchangeable default on all sites that support it.
Since not all Web sites have “https” capability, Bill Pennington, chief strategy officer with the Web site risk management firm WhiteHat Security in Santa Clara, Calif., said: “I tell people that if you’re doing things with sensitive data, don’t do it at a Wi-Fi hot spot. Do it at home.”
But home wireless networks may not be all that safe either, because of free and widely available Wi-Fi cracking programs like Gerix WiFi Cracker, Aircrack-ng and Wifite. The programs work by faking legitimate user activity to collect a series of so-called weak keys or clues to the password. The process is wholly automated, said Mr. Kitchen at Hak5, allowing even techno-ignoramuses to recover a wireless router’s password in a matter of seconds. “I’ve yet to find a WEP-protected network not susceptible to this kind of attack,” Mr. Kitchen said.
A WEP-encrypted password (for wired equivalent privacy) is not as strong as a WPA (or Wi-Fi protected access) password, so it’s best to use a WPA password instead. Even so, hackers can use the same free software programs to get on WPA password-protected networks as well. It just takes much longer (think weeks) and more computer expertise.
Using such programs along with high-powered Wi-Fi antennas that cost less than $90, hackers can pull in signals from home networks two to three miles away. There are also some computerized cracking devices with built-in antennas on the market, like WifiRobin ($156). But experts said they were not as fast or effective as the latest free cracking programs, because the devices worked only on WEP-protected networks.
To protect yourself, changing the Service Set Identifier or SSID of your wireless network from the default name of your router (like Linksys or Netgear) to something less predictable helps, as does choosing a lengthy and complicated alphanumeric password.
Setting up a virtual private network, or V.P.N., which encrypts all communications you transmit wirelessly whether on your home network or at a hot spot, is even more secure. The data looks like gibberish to a snooper as it travels from your computer to a secure server before it is blasted onto the Internet.
Popular V.P.N. providers include VyperVPN, HotSpotVPN and LogMeIn Hamachi. Some are free; others are as much as $18 a month, depending on how much data is encrypted. Free versions tend to encrypt only Web activity and not e-mail exchanges.
However, Mr. Palmer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation blames poorly designed Web sites, not vulnerable Wi-Fi connections, for security lapses. “Many popular sites were not designed for security from the beginning, and now we are suffering the consequences,” he said. “People need to demand ‘https’ so Web sites will do the painful integration work that needs to be done.”
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Tech Tip -- Getting on Wireless on Canada Island
We arrived. Duh. But just an hour ago I got the wireless internet connection figured out. I was desolate yesterday for the lack of it. The answer came back to me in a dream. "Refresh to an earlier date" on my computer when the computer was working flawlessly with wireless at home in Cincinnati. Bam. "Wireless network is now available." Plug in Becca's code and repeat (wash and repeat) and I was on.
It's pleasant up here (probably berable down there too I imagine).
Remember to take the recycle bin out to the street Sunday night. Same with garbage which stays close to the garage but outside in the driveway.
:)
It's pleasant up here (probably berable down there too I imagine).
Remember to take the recycle bin out to the street Sunday night. Same with garbage which stays close to the garage but outside in the driveway.
:)
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Tech Tips -- Restoring Folder List to Microsoft Outlook Express
Click on Views, Layout and go from there. Works for Microsoft Outlook too, I believe.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Tech Tips -- Five and Facebook
By SARAH PEREZ of ReadWriteWeb
Published: September 16, 2009
When the President of the United States warns schoolchildren to watch what they say and do on Facebook, you know that we've got a problem...and it's not one limited to the U.S.'s borders, either. People everywhere are mindlessly over-sharing on the world's largest social network, without a second thought as to who's reading their posts or what effect it could have on them further down the road. For example, did you know that 30% of today's employers are using Facebook to vet potential employees prior to hiring? In today's tough economy, the question of whether to post those embarrassing party pics could now cost you a paycheck in addition to a reputation. (Keep that in mind when tagging your friends' photos, too, won't you?)
Announcing the ReadWrite Real-Time Web Summit, Research Report and Month of Special Coverage
ReadWriteWeb's Top 5 Web Trends of 2009
Researchers Discover Botnet Commanded by Google Groups
Top 5 Web Trends of 2009: Internet of Things
Forget the iTunes LP, Apps Are the New Album
But what can be done? It's not like you can just quit Facebook, right? No - and you don't have to either. You just need to take a few precautions.
Unbeknownst to most mainstream Facebook users, the social network actually offers a slew of privacy controls and security features which can help you batten down the hatches, so to speak. If used properly, you'll never have to worry about whether you should friend the boss and your mom. You can friend anyone you want while comfortable in the knowledge that not everyone gets to see everything you post.
The problem in implementing these privacy options is that they're just too confusing for most non-tech savvy people to handle. And often, folks don't want to bother to take the time to learn. To simplify the process, we're offering five easy steps you can take today to help make your Facebook experience safer, more secure, and more private.
Step 1: Make Friend Lists
Yes, it will take some time, especially if you're connected to a couple hundred friends already. But this step, while not the quickest, is fairly simple. And it will be one of the most useful things you can do on Facebook.
Friend lists, like they sound, are lists for categorizing your friends into various groups. The nice thing about this feature is that once you set these lists up, you won't have to do it again. We suggest that you put your work colleagues and professional acquaintances into a friend list designated "work," personal friends you're not very close with into a list called "Acquaintances," and people you're related to into a list called "Family." Those three main categories will separate out the groups of "friends" who you may want to hide some information from.
To create a friend list, click on "Friends" at the top of the Facebook homepage. In the left-hand column, click "Friends" again under the "Lists" section. Now you'll see a button at the top that says "Create New List". Click it. In the pop-up that appears, you can name your list and pick members. If you've ever shared an application with your friends, the process of doing this will be very familiar.
When you've finished making lists, you'll be able to use them when selecting who can see what (or who can't!) when configuring the security settings described below.
Step 2: Who Can See What on Your Profile
At the top right of Facebook, there's a menu that many people probably ignore: "Settings." But this menu is now going to become your best friend. To get started, hover you mouse over the Settings menu and click "Privacy Settings" from the list that appears. On the next page, click "Profile." This takes you to a page where you can configure who gets to see certain information on your profile.
Before making changes, think carefully about the sorts of things you want public and the things you want private. Should "everyone" get to see photos you're tagged in? Or would you like to limit this only to those you've specifically chosen as Facebook friends?
Underneath each section on this page (basic info, personal info, status, etc.), you can designate who gets to see that particular bit of information. For anyone not using custom lists (see step 1), the best thing to enter here is "Only Friends." Anything else opens up your profile information to people you may or may not know. For example, choosing "Everyone" makes that info public, "Friends of Friends" lets your friends' friends see it, "My Networks and Friends" opens up your info to anyone in your networks - that means anyone in your city, your high school, your college, a professional organization you listed, etc.
You can also block certain groups from seeing these sections, too. On any item that offers an "Edit Custom Settings" option, you can click that link to display a pop-up box where you can choose people or lists to block (see where it says "Except these people"). If you haven't made custom lists as explained in step 1 above, you can enter individual names here instead. (Sorry, mom, dad, boss - this is where you get blocked.)
Step 3: Who Can See Your Address and Phone Number
Did you list your address and phone number on Facebook? While that's a handy feature, you may not want everyone you friended to have this information. To access this configuration page, you follow the same steps as above in step 2 to display the Profile Privacy page. You'll notice that the page has two tabs at the top - click on the one that reads "Contact information."
As previously described above, you can again use the drop-down lists provided to designate who gets to see what and/or block certain people or lists from viewing this information. The sections on this page include "IM Screen Name," "Mobile Phone," "Other Phone," "Current Address," "Website," and your email.
Step 4: Change Who Can Find You on Facebook via Search
1
2 Next Page »
RecommendMore Articles in Technology »
Subscribe to Technology RSS Feeds
Technology News
Internet
Start-Ups
Business Computing
Companies
Bits Blog
Personal Tech
Pogue’s Posts
MOST POPULAR - TECHNOLOGY
E-Mailed
Blogged
The 3 Facebook Settings Every User Should Check Now
With Apple Tablet, Print Media Hope for a Payday
5 Easy Steps to Stay Safe (and Private!) on Facebook
Bits: Twitter Could Become the Unemployed’s Best Friend
Cheap Mobile Calls, Even Overseas
After 10 Years, Federal Money for Technology in Education
Legal Sites Plan Revamps as Rivals Undercut Price
Verizon Posts Loss, Citing Charge Related to Layoffs
A Playland for Apps in a Tablet World
Bits: Google Voice Comes to iPhone, Palm Pre Go to Complete List »
In Apple Tablet, Print Media Hope for a Payday
Apple Courts Publishers, While Kindle Adds Apps
If Your Password's Still 123456, It Might as Well Be HackMe
Legal Sites Plan Revamps as Rivals Undercut Price
YouTube to Introduce Limited Film Rental Service
Hungry for New Content, Google Tries to Grow Its Own in Africa
Digital Muse for Beat Poet
Nokia Responds to Google Challenge on Navigation Software
Venture Capital Was Tight for Tech Start-Ups in '09
A Playland for Apps in a Tablet World Go to Complete List »
Advertise on NYTimes.com
Inside NYTimes.com
Art & Design »
Coffin’s Emblem Defies Certainty
N.Y. / Region »
Ripped Picasso Is Only One of Many Art Mishaps
U.S. »
Courts as Battlefields in Climate Fights
Opinion »
Editorial: The Taliban Would Applaud
President Sarkozy is foolishly inciting anti-Muslim prejudices as a way to deflect public anger over high unemployment.
Dining & Wine »
Replicating Restaurant Dishes at Home
Opinion »
Op-Ed: State of the Union, in Dutch
Theater »
Life, Death and Family in Foote’s Texas
Travel »
Gaming the Luggage System
Opinion »
Appreciations: A Responsible Man
Robert B. Semple Jr. on how Charles Mathias ignored party disciplinarians and demagogues and acted on principle alone.
Great Homes »
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)