Showing posts with label natural gas is not like oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label natural gas is not like oil. Show all posts

Friday, April 27, 2012

Exactly Who Has Captured the Savings on Low Natural Gas?

“Whatever gas has taken away, natural gas has returned to the consumer.” CNBC commentator just now.

I question this, since I believe the middlemen have captured the "return," unknown to the consumer.

Cramer is starting to slam Procter.  He did so this morning on CNBC, before he had heard the conference call, which occurred at 8:30 am.  You can be sure it will be mentioned on Mad Money tonight.  He praises Clorox and all other competitors of P&G.

...Yes he did continue to slam P&G on Mad Money, praising the competition Kimberly Clark for getting pretty much everything right that P&G was getting wrong.  Said not to buy Procter as there was more falling to come in the stock price.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Cramer -- Just Brilliant Last Night

(c) 2010 F. Bruce Abel

OK, so I stopped TIVOing and stopped watching Cramer for the last month or so. Went over to Fast Money guys, whom I like a lot. (Remember, complexity is your friend in trading. It keeps your eye off the ball -- so to speak.)

So Eunie was going to be out until 8 pm or so (she hates the clatter of Cramer and hates the thought that I might be losing a lot of money). So I watched Cramer last night. Awesome! A seminal segment. Or is it just me?

ed note: I just went onto No Hot Air,

http://nohotair.typepad.co.uk/no_hot_air/

and I am reminded that Cramer has been awful when predicting natural gas. So maybe he's not so good on oil either.

Anyway, herein his monumental call on oil stocks and also his withering take on why the analysts are not doing their jobs (they don't read his books is their basic fault).

Here is the beginning of Cramer's verbatim comments for the latter segment. For the former, scroll down to the very bottom of my blog and click on the lisk to "the best of the best" or whatever.

Jim: Surprise! Surprise! Over and over again people have been shocked, absolutely shocked by positive earnings surprises… that should not have been surprising to anyone… hence, my desire to give you a surprise party… in honor of these bogus surprises… they have become the theme of this earnings season… and we saw it play out again today with the surprise of Caterpillar… and the surprise of Whirlpool… two companies that baffled market players with their strength when they reported… standouts on a blah day when the Dow gained less than a point… the S&P was down about a half a percent… just as Netflix, Deckers, and Chipotle shocked, surprised and amazed so many investors with the greatness of their quarters last week...





The only thing surprising here besides my full dressed cake explosion… instead of a more scantily clad, perhaps even a bare-chested bust out… is that anyone was surprised by these fabulous numbers… in fact, they were all predictable… and all easy to see from a mile away if you are looking from the friendly confines of Cramerica… yet these quarters astonished so many people… that is how you get a 10 point single day move in a stock like Whirlpool… I mean a washer and dryer company, this is not no biotech… because some key institutional investors, including short selling hedge funds, just did not see the strength coming… if you watch the surprise party, it all seems very dated to me… the surprise, I mean come on, shocker… and you probably saw the good news coming if you follow the show.

So how come so many investors were genuinely blindsided? How is that possible? Did they just like the movie “Blindside” so much that they decided that blindside would make a good investing strategy? Even if it was a coining, grading cinema… well, anyway… no, no, the institutional investors who were bewildered by Netflix… bewildered by Deckers… bewildered by Chipotle… hey, bewildered by Caterpillar… and bewildered by Whirlpool… well, wait a second, all have one thing in common… they believe the Wall Street analysts who write and squawk on these stocks… and when things got better for the companies during the quarter, the earnings estimates proffered by those analysts were frozen in time from the last quarterly update.

You see these surprises were effectively created by the analysts because they have for the most part, abdicated and advocated their chief responsibility… and stopped entirely trying to calculate or gain estimates intra-quarter… that is not the way it was when I was running my half a billion dollars… uh-uh, see the old days before the adoption of regulation FD, there would have been a slew of repeated intra-quarter estimate bumps on these names… which would have eliminated the blindside surprise factor… but now the analysts have become static and predictable… all they do is extrapolate the last quarter once, right after it reports… and do not take into account anything that has happened in the last three months… that is the root of the surprise factor and the bogus surprise party that I am throwing… that is what propelled these stocks higher.

That is how Caterpillar and Whirlpool took so many people by surprise today… because the people are supposed to be trying to help you stay ahead of the game, weren’t paying attention to what has been happening over the last 3 months… the lift in the consumer, which of course benefited Netflix… Deckers, Chipotle… and Whirlpool… or the obvious return of the emerging markets that helped Caterpillar… were you really surprised? No, because you are not an analyst… these developments were clear to everyone but the analysts who is supposed to tell you what is going to do well… they are paid millions of dollars to do this but they cannot seem to model for the changes that are occurring… positive changes in the worldwide domestic economies… so they just wait for the companies to report before they update their numbers… they listen to their conference call and then they do a spreadsheet… that is all they do now.

And what is so crazy to me is that this almost fictional surprise based on sloth and paralysis, keeps happening over and over again… it keeps working… here look, take Whirlpool, for months now this company… for so many months this company has been telling anyone who would listen that they are really seeing the benefits of the Maytag acquisition… as well as incentives to buy new energy efficient washers and dryers… plus Brazil is a huge market for them… it has been since 1980.. .how could this stock have almost 10 days to cover a short ratio? How could someone bet against this? Given how often Whirlpool told you that things were going great guns… and that is how you rally 10 points when you report… short squeezes by those un, using the previously outdated analysts numbers that do not take into account the nation and the worlds changes since Whirlpool reported last.

Okay, how about Caterpillar? Which has told you again, and again, and again, that orders are coming back globally… and they are a global company… at the same time the domestic market has been so-so.. which is why the analysts seem to be keep missing the big picture… they are like domestic analysts… Caterpillar is a gigantic emerging market play… and emerging markets are incredibly strong… how can people be surprised at the Premier earth moving company is putting up huge numbers? Also, how many times did investors have to hear that you have to buy these stocks… on this show we have been saying it… when the earnings blossom? But before the revenue growth kicks in… people are saying, oh no until I see sales I am not buying… okay, now you have saw your sales… look at what price you had to pay… now, you see what happens when sales accelerate and you are just… well, let’s just say that you almost missed it… you got hurt if you waited for the all clear… if you are waiting for the bell to go off? You are in the wrong game…. go into boxing... unlike the analysts who had to anticipate the turn, you had to jump the gun.

Okay, then there is Deckers… this is one of my plus $100 stocks that I said will not quit… it has now entered the parabolic phase .. in part because the shorts pressed their bets and mistakenly believed that Ugg’s must have cooled off… maybe, look some day they will… but this is a $2b company with a potential Nike like franchise… Nike has a $35b market cap.

How about the Chipotle? It is worth talking about… it has the domestic model of good food… that is right, food that actually does not kill you for reasonable prices… I bet you that that is going to play perfectly overseas… they have a new kind of store, they call it the Model A.. it fits into all of those openings in the mall that are not doing well.. they used to just be in new malls… now next month they are opening in London… Europe soon after… this will be so easy for them because do you know what they do? They source food locally… they will become the first American company to not be an ugly American… they will be using French food… again, it is only $4.5b company… never mind McDonald’s which I own for ActionAlertsPlus.com, my charitable trust, is a $76b company… once again, polymeric move courtesy of the frantic short coverings by hedge funds who simply refused to believe how good this story is.. and you have to be cognizant of how Europe and possibly Asia can fuel international growth… even as there are many more places to put this 1,000 store chain in America without cannibalization… the analysts kept their numbers static… the short sellers believed it.

And finally there is one of my absolutely favorite plays, Netflix… which has the best subscriber growth of any… this stock is now up 30 points from last week… you know, I have got to tell you, there are myriad portfolio managers that love subscriber models for incredibly consistent cash flow and easy does it renewals… again this is only a $5.5b company… it could double in size at a rather rapid pace… no wonder this stock is galloping.

These moves, these so called surprises, were telegraphed in advance… they were telephoned for heaven’s sake… Lady GaGa/Beyonce style… but the analysts were not listening… the surprises? They are surprised because the analysts have allowed themselves to be surprised… I call them sanction surprises… we on Mad Money do the opposite… it is why these Cramer fave situations like Whirlpool, Netflix, Chipotle, Deckers and Cat might elude the incredibly overpaid Wall Street researchers… but they should have been anything but surprising to you at home.

Here is the bottom line…

▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼



Now that you know what is behind the mystifying fact that anyone is mystified by these quarters, well, maybe you can anticipate better… analysts who do not update their numbers during the quarter… and do not nail the top down improvements in the consumer and emerging markets with the franchises that they cover, are the fodder for the moves in a Whirlpool, or a Deckers, or a Caterpillar, or a Netflix, or a Chipotle… the big non-surprise surprise party, no wonder these big money managers cannot beat you… they are relying on the people who are the most surprised… so they get blindsided... I do not want that happening to you.


Saturday, January 23, 2010

Why Are Natural Gas Price Forecasts So Wrong?

(c) 2010 F. Bruce Abel

And the same can now be said of electricity.

Map of Pyrenees tale!

Jan 22, 2010
Why are gas price forecasts so wrong?
The 2009 Integrated Energy Policy Report of California Energy Commission first caught my eye when it predicted that there will be no need for LNG imports (either directly or via Sempra Energy's Ensenada terminal in Mexico) thanks to shale production.
But the report also addresses a key problem of natural gas: volatile pricing:
Past efforts to forecast natural gas prices have been highly inaccurate compared to actual prices, even when price volatility was largely dominated by traditional, physical market factors. Additionally, as the United States continues moving toward a carbon‐constrained existence, future greenhouse gas policies will further complicate these efforts, likely rendering future natural gas price forecasts even less accurate and more uncertain.
UK market participants, especially Ofgem, need to take the next sentence on board:
The uncertainty associated with predicting major input variables and the resulting natural gas price forecasts bring into question the value of producing date‐specific, single‐point natural gas price forecasts.
Simply put there is so much going on in the variables of natural gas price forecasts (i.e. the forward curve of prices that the vast majority of UK consumers have little choice but to accept), that predicting future prices is impossible. I could fill a page or two alone listing the known unknowns of natgas pricing. But of course it's the unknowns that then come and bite us in the butt.
The solution? Possibly, to stop even trying. In formulating this counter advice a tip of the hat to Nobel Prize laureate for Economics in 2003, Daniel Kahneman, father of behavioural economics, who would immediately identify those who seek a fixed priced gas contract as suffering from the syndrome he describes in his Map of the Pyrenees tale.
Kahneman recalls when asked about the economic models at the root of the current financial crisis is actually taken from history, not an experiment. It concerns a group of Swiss soldiers who set out on a long navigation exercise in the Alps. The weather was severe and they got lost. After several days, with their desperation mounting, one of the men suddenly realized he had a map of the region
They followed the map and managed to reach a town. When they returned to base and their commanding officer asked how they had made their way back, they replied, "We suddenly found a map." The officer looked at the map and said, "You found a map, all right, but it's not of the Alps, it's of the Pyrenees." According to Kahneman, the moral of the story is that some of our economic models, perhaps those of the investment world, are worthless. But individual investors need security - maps of the Pyrenees - even if they are, in effect, worthless.
We need to ask some questions. First, lets ask ourselves why is it important to have a fixed price. Or to put it another way, what do we fear and what outcome are we seeking to avoid by accepting a fixed price?
Secondly, lets look at the difference between a fixed price and a floating price closely linked to wholesale prices that changes monthly. Perhaps the premium for "security" is fair and transparent.But how do we know when no one provides a benchmark?
Thirdly, lets look at how wholesale prices translated into retail prices today.
Lastly, do we have an alternative to fixed prices? How can we get one?
I'll get back to the answers in detail soon. But for now, let's ask if predictions as practiced in the commodity markets are about as valuable a portent of future price as reading the entrails of a sacrificial lamb? Point number one:The main influence on natural gas prices is weather. But how do we predict prices when we can't even get close with weather:
The UK Met Office is debating what to do with its long-term and seasonal forecasting after criticism for failing to predict extreme weather.Some experts say the Met Office should stop longer-term forecasting.
The one sure variable we can all agree on is that the biggest impact on short term wholesale gas commodity movements is the weather. Predicting the weather falls off rapidly as time recedes.We've seen that predicting weather even a month ahead is practically worthless in temperature forecasts. If weather predicting is without value, then a major component of gas forecasting is as well. Oil prices used to be better, but right now oil is 100% up on this time last year and gas 60% down. With the gas oil link most likely permanently an ex-factor in price prediction, what's left?
So why should end users continue to get talked, scared or just plain suckered into taking long term prices? The fact that in the UK they don't have much of an alternative explains a lot. Which I'll revisit in depth at another time.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Natural Gas is Not Like Oil

(c) 2009 F. Bruce Abel

My very first blog on this site (you can check it out) was the topic Natural Gas is Not Like Oil.

Now, see how prescient I was?

Read on from this excellent site today:


Nov 16, 2009
The Gas Oil Link
In UK natural gas prices, 2009 has seen a paradigm shift, a game changer and a revolution.
The paradigm shift has been the drop in energy consumption. Although the recession had a big part in this, energy consumption of oil, gas and electricity started to go down in 2005 in what are called "developed" economies which signifies that the "recovery" if it ever shows up, does not mean a return to the bad old days.
The revolution has been shale.
The game changer is the globalisation of natural gas prices, primarily deriving from the sudden emergence of shale reserves pointing toward a future permanence of prices divorced from a link to oil prices.
The gas oil link has always been controversial among UK end-users but had been considered permanent due to the power of the link's big fans at Gazprom and Algeria's Sonatrach among others.
The link is over 50 years old and in Europe started out in the Netherlands. At the time, natural gas was a disappointment; the real prize was oil. Natural gas didn't have anywhere near the infrastructure or popularity it does today and gas had to compete with oil. Gas was naturally cheaper than oil, but had to remain priced in comparison to oil. This made sense when comparing gas versus oil in fuel switching at generators or as feedstock in chemicals or for very large end users. It wasn't very rational in pricing at small users - no one we know has dual fuel central heating. The link was logical in the days when oil was plentiful and carbon was a non-issue. Today, gas has two major advantages to oil: it has 31% less carbon content and doesn't have any of the supply issues, actual or imagined, that surround oil.

http://nohotair.typepad.co.uk/no_hot_air/2009/11/the-gas-oil-link.html

Is this permanent? Via the FT's Energy Source Blog, we asked Fatih Birol, chief economist of the International Energy Agency the following. I've highlighted some key points:
The link between oil and natural gas prices is getting very frayed. Do you see it breaking permanently?
A. Dear Nick Grealy, in Europe and Asia-Pacific, gas is imported mainly under long-term contracts, which, in most cases, link the price of the gas to changes in the prices of oil under what are called indexation formulae. The original logic behind this arrangement is that gas competes against oil products, though increasingly gas competes more against other fuels, including coal and electricity. For now, the exporters and many importers are happy to stick with oil indexation. But the glut of gas that is building up does could put increasing pressure on both sides to adjust their pricing terms and even move towards an alternative pricing system, the most obvious of which would be direct indexation to spot or future gas prices. Russia’s Gazprom and Algeria’s Sonatrach – the two biggest external suppliers to Europe – have lost market share over the past year to cheaper spot LNG. They may decide at some point that enough is enough, and opt to move away form oil indexation, though they have made it absolutely clear that they have no intention of doing so for the time being. And the big importers may also start asking for it, as the gap between the price of cheaper spot gas and the price of gas under their long-term contracts widens. For now they don’t want to upset the status quo, but again that could change – especially if their confidence in pricing on the basis of spot markets increase. Certainly, the gas glut proves a window of opportunity for Europe and Asia to move to a more rational system of market-based pricing

So I'm setting up a new label: natural gas is not like oil

So it is easier to see just my blogs on this topic.



Monday, June 11, 2007

Natural Gas is NOT Like Oil

This quote from the best-known writer on geology of our country (and also a writer for the New Yorker):


Natural gas is to oil as politicians are to statesmen. Any organic material whatsoever will form natural gas and will form it rapidly, at earth-surface temperatures and on up to many hundreds of degrees. ... "You get natural gas as soon as anything drops dead." For oil, the requisites are the organic material and [a] thermal window [of 50-150 degrees centigrade over millions of years]. John McPhee, In Suspect Terrain, N.Y. Noonday Press, 1991, p.55

Labels